Challenge: Rising student numbers put pressure on lecturers' workload affecting assessment quality and student learning. How can we make, both formative and summative, assessment scalable while maintaining quality and keeping the UM's vision on education and assessment in mind?
Goal: Implement scalable assessment design in our first year bachelor math courses (calculus and linear algebra).
Scalable assessment design recipes.
Our department has recently introduced a new bachelor, effectively doubling the number of students in the first year from 250 to 500 students. This increase was only partially expected and flanked by some additional staff. This relatively sudden increase has put enormous pressure on the staff's workload which in turn has effects on the assessment quality. For example, assessment are redesigned in such a way that the workload is decreased, e.g, extensive feedback moments are replaced by (often) less qualitatitative peer assessments, assignments are removed and a higher weight is put on the final exam, project presentations are shortened while team sizes have increased, grading rubrics are made simpler and smaller, etc. We do not yet know what the impact is on the constructive alignment on the course and curriculum level of all these changes.
Furthermore, the UM's vision on education revolves around four aspects: problem-based learning, small-scale teaching, societal relavance, and international classroom. Especially the first two aspects are under tremendous pressure by the student number increase. The vision is showing cracks due to scaling issues. Additionally, the UM's vision on assessment revolves around assessment of learning, assessment for learning, assessment as learning. The student number increase, again, puts a lot of pressure on the latter two modes and it's unclear as of yet how this impacts student learning.
The rising student numbers have (or will) put enormous stress, especially, on our first year math courses such as calculus, discrete mathematics, linear algebra, and numerical mathematics.
Implement scalable assessment formats that align with the UM's vision on education and assessment for our first year math courses.
In this user case, we intend to organize a CPD workshop on scalable assessment design for fellow lecturers. We do this by giving a set of "recipes" with concrete examples.
We will also write an article for edUMinded to disseminate the ideas more widely within the university.
The teaching material comprise a slide deck with concrete assessment examples such a
We follow the ADDIE approach to implement this CPD activity:
The assessment design recipes are topic-independent, but have been implemented by the workshop organizer in the context of (multivariable) calculus and linear algebra. Initially, we want to exploit these concrete examples specifically by organizing workshops for the coordinators of similar courses.
We hope to have an impact at several (increasing) levels:
We will organize this workshop for the respective course coordinators at the departmental and faculty level to inspire them to use our design recipes. We will provide support throughout the course to help them with the implementation. At a later stage, we hope to organize the workshop as a CPD workshop via Edlab, our UM-wide teaching and learning center, so that we can reach the whole university.
See above.
This CPD scenario describes a User case in which lecturers develop their competence in sound course design and teaching in higher education and organizing peer-feedback and collaborative learning and develop attitudes in how to stay motivated and self-regulate their continuous professional development and knowledge sharing.
The approximate duration of a User case that follows this scenario is several hours.
In this CPD scenario the participants professionalize in a close connection to their own teaching practice (at their workplace) and meet in person on location with the training staff and with other participants.