Laboratory class requires that students read the experimental methodology in advance to understand what they will be doing and the safety procedure for each experiment. Teachers struggle to assess if the students read and understood the experimental methodology and are aware of the risk of each solvent/reagent. Nowadays, the assessment is done by an individual report delivered at the beginning of the class, which increases the workload of the lecturer. Thus, an assessment method that reflects if the students read and understand the procedure, which will be more equal to every student, and reduce the workload of the teacher is still needed.
Decrease the teachers workload and promote the equality in the assessment of lab preparation reports.
The discipline Fundamentals of Chemistry is taught to first-semester students from several undergraduate courses, having more than 500 students enrolled. The practical classes occur every two weeks, and the students have to deliver an individual report at the beginning of the class, and a final report done in pairs. The individual report has the aim to guarantee that the students read and understand the experimental procedure to be able to carry on the practical work, while being aware of the risks of the laboratory work. However, these individual pre-lab reports are only assessed after the class and increase the teacher workload. Furthermore, each teacher has a different way of grading these reports and the students complain about that.
This CPD scenario describes a User case in which lecturers develop their competence in sound course design and teaching in higher education and how to engage and motivate students and how to facilitate discipline specific thinking and how to use blended learning and develop attitudes in supporting student development and enabling students’ well-being in a learning process and inclusivity and reflecting on own teaching practice and knowledge sharing.
The approximate duration of a User case that follows this scenario is several months.
In this CPD scenario the participants professionalize in a close connection to their own teaching practice (at their workplace) and meet in person on location with the training staff and with other participants.